There has been a good deal written about the similarities of the camera to the eye as well as the computer to human memory. What I would like to do is clarify the uniqueness of the human brain from camera technology and at the same time show the similarities between brain function, photography and cognition.

Human Memory and the Photograph

Memories of our experiences connect with one another and they are the basis of who we are as individuals. Memories of our experiences are called autobiographical memories and they rely on a brain region called the hippocampus.

If the hippocampus were to be taken out of your brain right now, you would be stuck in time and memories of new experiences would rapidly fade away. The hippocampus functions to create a seamless story of the self.

It’s pretty clear that there is a connection between human memory and the photographs we take. Simply put, a photo is information about past light that we can perceive in present time. Similarly, memories are the effects of our past experiences on our present selves. Photographs can serve as memory storage and, when viewed, can activate memory recall.

Medial Temporal Dissection Revealing the Hippocampus

The basis of our autobiographical memory is what happened, where it happened and when it happened. Similarly, the photos we take can store information of whatwhere , and when. In this regard, a photograph is very much like a memory of a life event. Interestingly, doctored images may be more of an accurate analogy to memory, but that’s for another day.

Some History on Memory Research

Before we get to the interaction between human memory and the photograph, it’s first important to understand some of the neuroscientific history on memory research. Present day memory research owes a lot to the patient Henry Gustav Molaison, who was simply known to the research community as patient H.M.. H.M. had debilitating seizures that developed after a bike accident as a child. For 18 years various treatments did not work in helping him with his seizures.

Henry Molaison in 1953 before his medial temporal lobectomy

In 1953 H.M. had both of his hippocampi removed, and some of the surrounding brain called the temporal lobe as well. After the surgery H.M. was no longer able to form new memories about his personal experiences. He was in his late twenties during his surgery and because he could not form new autobiographical memories he was perpetually stuck in his twenties.

The surgery eventually stopped his seizures, but the amnesia that resulted was completely unexpected and since then the research on hippocampus autobiographical memory formation has grown exponentially.

The photographer Phillip Toledano published a book in 2010 that exemplifies H.M.’s dilemma. Like H.M., Phillip Toledano’s father could not form new memories and primarily remembered himself as a younger man. A picture that Toledano took of his father looking in the mirror shows just how powerful the impact of his amnesia was on his identity. Because Toledano’s father remembers himself only as a young man, he is in disbelief that the individual in the mirror is actually him.

The Neural Circuits that Make Autobiographical Memories

Of all our senses, vision is the strongest and most influential in memory formation. It is no wonder then that our autobiographical memories are primarily visual and that they are so important to us. Through memory and anatomical studies, the neural pathways from the eye to the hippocampus have been well mapped out.

Schematic of the Eye

When light bounces off an object and travels to the eye, it first makes contact with the cornea. From the cornea the light goes through the iris (much like the aperture in a camera lens) and then through the lens where light is focused onto the fovea of the retina.

The fovea is where we have the highest visual acuity and it’s the primary part of the retina that computes different frequencies of light, i.e. color. Like the RGB light cavities on a camera sensor, our photoreceptors respond to specific colors. Humans have photoreceptors that respond to blue, green or red.

The human visual system. The red fibers represent the optic chiasm while the blue clusters represent the thalamus.

Visual information leaves the eye and travels down the optic nerve. The optic nerve from each eye cross at the optic chiasm and it is here where the left visual world and the right visual world cross over. The end result of this crossing is that the right brain computes information from the left visual world and the left brain computes information from the right visual world. As a result, if you were to have damage to your right occipital lobe, you may lose the ability to see or even be aware of the left side of your world.

After the optic chiasm, one of the first regions of the brain that the optic nerve comes in contact with is the thalamus. Specifically, the optic nerve ends at the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the thalamus. The thalamus is the gatekeeper of all sensory information (except smell) that is sent to the neocortex (the newest and outermost part of the brain).

The human brain and its various lobes

When you fall asleep, the thalamus restricts the sensory information that travels to the neocortex, which is one reason why you are unconscious during sleep. At the LGN the visual information is being separated by left vs. right eye, movement and by color.

Next, the visual information from the LGN is sent to the primary visual cortex, which is part of the occipital lobe. It is a bit ironic that we do not begin to perceive the image until the information reaches the occipital lobe. Eyes collect and compute data, but we don’t see with our eyes, we see with our brains.

From the occipital lobe, visual information transfers in two general directions. One direction is important for processing information about space while the other direction is important for processing information about objects. Eventually spatial and object information are sent to and combined in the hippocampus. The hippocampus combines information about space and information about objects, which results in our ability to form autobiographical memories.

Visual pathway through to the hippocampus

How Do Photographs Interact With Memory?

There are many ways to answer this question, but we will focus on one example that parallels H.M.’s memory deficits. Microsoft researchers have been studying the role of photography in strengthening memories in individuals with damaged hippocampi. These individuals with hippocampal damage have autobiographical memory deficits, meaning they cannot recall the events of their lives and after a few days their memories of life events fade away.

Microsoft developed a wearable camera, which they call the SenseCam. This camera passively takes photos throughout the day. In this study, participants with hippocampal damage reviewed all the photos taken during their day. The level of recall in individuals with the SenseCam was then compared to memory recall of events without the SenseCam or to events that were written in a diary.

Microsoft Sensecam Lifelogging Camera

Participants with a SenseCam had greater levels of recall when compared to no SenseCam and when compared to only having a written diary. What is interesting about the findings is that it suggests that visual memory of events is stored outside the hippocampus, but only after studying photographs.

It may be the case that studying photos of life events help bypass the hippocampus and undergo processing in a different brain region or regions. One interesting question is whether or not photos bring up associated emotions that occurred during those events in patients with hippocampal damage. Are these memories just facts of events or do they also contain emotion (which is often an important component of powerful images)?

Originally published on PetaPixel

Joshua Sariñana

Joshua Sariñana, PhD, obtained his degrees in neuroscience at the University of California, Los Angeles, and completed his doctoral thesis at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Sariñana’s multi-disciplinary art projects bridge art, science, and media. He has received several grants for his art projects, exhibited his work nationally and internationally, and has received numerous awards for his photographic work.

He combines his science communications background with his neuroscience and art practice. Sariñana has provided his expertise to WIRED Magazine, MIT Technology Review, MIT News, and as an invited speaker for the Neurohumanities series at Trinity College in Dublin.

http://joshuasarinana.com/
Previous
Previous

Manipulated Photographs, Manipulated Memories